reasoning field (containing its chain-of-thought process) and a content field (containing the final answer), allowing you to see how it thinks through problems. In this quick guide, we’ll go over the main use cases for Kimi K2 Thinking, how to get started with it, when to use it, and prompting tips for getting the most out of this incredible reasoning model.
How to use Kimi K2 Thinking
Get started with this model in just a few lines of code! The model ID ismoonshotai/Kimi-K2-Thinking and the pricing is $1.20 per 1M input tokens and $4.00 per 1M output tokens.
Since this is a reasoning model that produces both reasoning tokens and content tokens, you’ll want to handle both fields in the streaming response:
Use cases
Kimi K2 Thinking excels in scenarios requiring deep reasoning, strategic thinking, and complex problem-solving:- Complex Reasoning Tasks: Tackle advanced mathematical problems (AIME25, HMMT25, IMO-AnswerBench), scientific reasoning (GPQA), and logic puzzles that require multi-step analysis
- Agentic Search & Research: Automate research workflows using tools and APIs, with stable performance across 200–300 sequential tool invocations (BrowseComp, Seal-0, FinSearchComp)
- Coding with Deep Analysis: Solve complex software engineering tasks (SWE-bench, Multi-SWE-bench) that require understanding large codebases, generating patches, and debugging intricate issues
- Long-Horizon Agentic Workflows: Build autonomous agents that maintain coherent goal-directed behavior across extended sequences of tool calls, research tasks, and multi-step problem solving
- Strategic Planning: Create detailed plans for complex projects, analyze trade-offs, and orchestrate multi-stage workflows that require reasoning through dependencies and constraints
- Document Analysis & Pattern Recognition: Process and analyze extensive unstructured documents, identify connections across multiple sources, and extract precise information from large volumes of data
Prompting tips
| Tip | Rationale |
|---|---|
Keep the system prompt simple - "You are Kimi, an AI assistant created by Moonshot AI." is the recommended default. | Matches the prompt used during instruction tuning. |
| Temperature = 1.0 | The recommended temperature for Kimi-K2-Thinking; calibrated for optimal reasoning performance. |
| Leverage native tool calling | Pass a JSON schema in tools=[...]; set tool_choice="auto". Kimi decides when/what to call, maintaining stability across 200-300 calls. |
| Think in goals, not steps | Because the model is “agentic”, give a high-level objective (“Analyze this data and write a comprehensive report”), letting it orchestrate sub-tasks. |
| Manage context for very long inputs | 256 K is huge, but response speed drops on >100 K inputs; supply a short executive summary in the final user message to focus the model. |
| Allow adequate reasoning space | The model generates both reasoning and content tokens; ensure your max_tokens parameter accommodates both for complex problems. |
General Limitations of Kimi K2 Thinking
We’ve outlined various use cases for when to use Kimi K2 Thinking, but it also has a few situations where it currently isn’t the best choice:- Latency-sensitive applications: Due to the reasoning process, this model generates more tokens and takes longer than non-reasoning models. For real-time voice agents or applications requiring instant responses, consider the regular Kimi K2 or other faster models.
- Simple, direct tasks: For straightforward tasks that don’t require deep reasoning (e.g., simple classification, basic text generation), the regular Kimi K2 or other non-reasoning models will be faster and more cost-effective.
- Cost-sensitive high-volume use cases: At $4.00 per 1M output tokens (vs $3.00 for regular K2), the additional reasoning tokens can increase costs. If you’re processing many simple queries where reasoning isn’t needed, consider alternatives.